Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Was Hatshepsut a Pharaoh when she visited King Solomon’s Jerusalem?


 https://s3.amazonaws.com/engrade-myfiles/4026292586371897/hatshepsut1.jpg

 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

So proposes Adam Stuart, who has written: “…. I wrote earlier that it seems very improbable that Hatshepsut would have visited Solomon at any time before she became king, unless it were to visit her sister Neferbity/Nefrubity if that sister were the daughter of pharaoh who was married to Solomon (royalty sometimes visit each other, but do the chronological details of Neferbity’s life allow for this?). But if this were the case, then I would think that the Bible would have mentioned the relationship between the Queen of Sheba and pharaoh’s daughter, which it does not. It says that the Queen of Sheba came to prove Solomon with hard questions. It does not say that the Queen of Sheba came to visit pharaoh’s daughter, Solomon’s Egyptian wife”.

 

* * *

 

Disregarding how the biblical scribes might have referred to the phenomenon of a female king – {both “king” (melech) and “pharaoh” (pharoh) being used in the Bible for Egyptian monarchs} - I intend to argue here that the Old and New Testaments call Solomon’s guest “queen” simply because that is what she was at the time of her visit to Jerusalem.

Needless to say, there is a big difference between a Queen and a Pharaoh.

So I would date her visit earlier than Stuart does, and place it - as according to Hyam Maccoby (SIS Review, IV:4, “The Queen of Sheba and the Song of Songs”) and Dr. Ed Metzler (Conflict of Laws in the Israelite Dynasty of Egypt, http://moziani.tripod.com/dynasty/ammm_2_1.htm - in the context of a marriage.

Hence the phenomenal gifts (dowry), as opposed to the mean presents of the Punt expedition. What the queen had seen in Jerusalem had truly stunned her: the glory of king Solomon and his palace; the Temple and its liturgies; and the magnificent fleet. She wanted the same for her own land of Egypt, after she had returned. Ed Metzler takes this verb as implying a divorce. Metzler, n. 52:

 

"On their divorce cf. Ed Metzler, Discovering Mosaistics (N. 1) pp. 175 and 182–3. The word “divorce” (Latin divortium) derives from divertere “to turn away”, and thus the story about the Queen of Sheba ends by saying that “she turned”, and went away to her own land (1. Kings 10, 13 and 2. Chronicles 9, 12). The insertion of the two preceding verses (as e. g. Genesis 38 in the story of Joseph) indicates that a period of time, maybe 10 years, elapsed".

 

All purely political, of course.

She, though Solomon’s favourite wife, had not provided him with the requisite male heir. That was achieved by Rehoboam’s mother, an Ammonite named Naamah.

Only later, some time after her return to Egypt, did Hatshepsut become Pharaoh.

 

Punt

 

The Punt expedition, which Hatshepsut did not accompany - as has been well noted - was for the purpose of acquiring rare incense plants for her (Solomonic-type) temple at Deir el-Bahri. The campaign was led by Nehesi.

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Relief_of_Hatshepsut's_expedition_to_the_Land_of_Punt_by_%CE%A3%CF%84%CE%B1%CF%8D%CF%81%CE%BF%CF%82.jpg

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Thutmose I Crowns Hatshepsut


http://cdn0-a.production.liputan6.static6.com/medias/1208197/big/043992500_1461057534-20160419_ratu_mesir.jpg

 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

 

Comparing the tri-partite parallel crowning ceremonies of Solomon, by King David,

and of Hatshepsut by the 18th dynasty pharaoh, Thutmose (Tuthmosis) I.

 

 

 

 

The Coronation Ceremonies

 

The cultural overflow from the Israel of kings David and Solomon went to the very heart of the matter: to the coronation ceremony.

The very ceremonial procedure, in its three phases, that David used for the coronation of his chosen son, Solomon, was the procedure also used by pharaoh Thutmose I in the coronation of Hatshepsut, who is thought to have been the pharaoh’s daughter.

I have followed J. Baikie for the Egyptian texts below (A History of Egypt, A. and C. Black Ltd., London, 1929, Vol. 11, p. 63):

 

  1. The Assembly is Summoned

 

“David”, we are told, “assembled at Jerusalem all the officials of the tribes, the officers of the divisions that served the king, the commanders of thousands, ... of hundreds, the stewards of all the property ... and all the seasoned warriors” (I Chronicles 28:1).

Likewise in the case of the young Hatshepsut, Thutmose I: “... caused that there be brought to him the dignitaries of the king, the nobles, the companions, the officers of the court, and the chief of the people.

 

  1. The Future Ruler Presented

 

Next, David presented his son, Solomon, to the assembly as his successor, saying: ‘... of all my sons ... the Lord ... has chosen Solomon my son to sit upon the throne of the kingdom of the Lord, over Israel. He said to me, ‘It is Solomon your son .... I have chosen him to be My son, and I will be his Father’.’ (vv. 5-6).

So did Pharaoh present Hatshepsut to the august assembly: “Said His Majesty to them: ‘This my daughter ... Hatshepsut .... I have appointed her; she is my successor, she it is assuredly who will sit on my wonderful seat [throne]. She shall command the people in every place of the palace; she it is who shall lead you ...’.”

 

  1. The Assembly Embraces King's Decision

 

The assembly of Israel concurred wholeheartedly with David’s decision: “And all the assembly blessed the Lord ... and bowed their heads, and worshipped the Lord, and did obeisance to the king .... And they ate and drank before the Lord on that day with great gladness” (29:20, 22). Similarly, in the case of the Egyptian officials: “They kissed the earth at his feet, when the royal word fell among them .... They went forth, their mouths rejoiced, they published his proclamation to them”."

 

http://media-2.web.britannica.com/eb-media/47/189747-004-FF009236.jpg

 

Might not one have imagined that Egypt, so steeped in ceremony and cultic procedure over so many dynasties and centuries would by now have had its own inviolable court system?

How great, therefore, must have been the Israel of King David’s time that even its ceremonial procedures had flowed into Egypt?